Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Today's Essential Nugget

Hey Upperclassmen, I'm backkk! Gossip Girl here. And I have the biggest news ever. One of my many sources, FloFromProgressive, sends us this: Spotted on the third floor of the Academy, the scientific revolution has caused a bit of tension in the cramped AP Euro classroom. Thanks for the info, Flo!
On the fifth day of Christmas my true love gave to me, ROUND 5 (and 5 minions).
Isaac Newton, not to be confused with the delicious Fig Newton, was considered the "last of the magicians" since he was the last scientist to introduce basic scientific breakthroughs.

Do Newton's religious preferences contradict what we have previously discussed about the scientific revolution?- Newton was an intensely pious religious man, which possibly contradicts what we have discussed about the scientific revolution up to this point. The introduction of the Copernican hypothesis seemed to create a clear divide between the church and science. However, many of the scientists discussed in this chapter are far from people trying to hurt religious leaders. They were trying to explain the natural world around them without the restraints of societal pressures (and religion) trying to hold them down from such discoveries.
Here is a scandalous image of Sir Isaac Newton.
What is the law of universal gravitation?- A significant Newtonian discovery was the law of universal gravitation, which states that the gravitational force between two objects in the universe is proportional to the products of the masses, so as the distance between the two objects increases, the gravitational force decreases (and vice versa). Since we are five, use this link if you want a pretty good explanation of gravity by CrashCourse Kids: Gravitational Pull Explanation

What caused the scientific revolution?

1. Universities gave men the ability to reach a greater academic potential, which then produced an institution willing to foster the minds of future scientists.
Because people had big shoes to fill...or big jackets.
2. The Renaissance also created a foreground for scientific development. With the recuperation of ancient academic works (both mathematical and scientific), people returned to scientific interest. Also, with humanist and individualist feelings, which stressed the power of the individual, men wanted to reach their highest potential. This need for progress partly came from Renaissance ideals.
Still waiting on my "T for Troy" necklace tbh...
3. Science became applicable to the common world with improvements in navigation. While travel was not a new concept (obviously), the need to make voyages more accurate and easier through technology became a new idea and a new necessity in the changing world. Science was now used to solve a problem.
BY USING LATITUDE & LONGITUDE!
4. Through navigational advancements came the birth of modern scientific instruments (such as the microscope and thermometer). With new instruments, people were able to obtain scientific knowledge that was more accurate than information gained by the naked eye. New advances in technology led to new breakthroughs in science.
Close enough because both BEND...mhm I went there!
Caroline's Dictionary Word-of-the-Day:
Empiricism (noun) - the theory that all knowledge is derived from sense-experience; general theory of inductive reasoning; "blank slate"
Everyone's feelings now that Caroline has her computer back.
What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning?- Deductive reasoning is information that starts out on a broad spectrum and then is deduced to a specific fact. Inductive reasoning starts from a specific point and then expands to a broader spectrum.
....
Example of deductive and inductive reasoning:

What was the Enlightenment?- The Enlightenment was a period that was focused on progress using reason and methodology to ensure such advancements. However, it was a period directed towards the upper class, thus, similar to the Renaissance, the Enlightenment was not a widespread "thing." Unfortunately for Jacque the Peasant, it wasn't directed towards him.

Mr. Yarnall's nugget of wisdom: "The Enlightenment changed the way society was ordered."
Dang. Go Yarn.
Some concluding words...
I think Nicole and Mr. Yarnall need to hug their issues out...or shall I say HAND HUG!
Grab your shades and your sunblock. This one looks like a scorcher. Until then, you know you love me. XOXO, Gossip Girl






Science Is Confusing (But Important)


Please ignore the fact that some words are in different size fonts.

The "scientific revolution" occurred during the 1700s.  People had previously focused on religion and used theology to validate their decisions.  During the scientific revolution, people focused more on science and reason, but they didn't abandon religion completely.

The scientific revolution was indeed revolutionary because it changed the world-view (people's outlook on life).

Aristotle’s ideas were accepted for so long because they offered an understandable explanation for what people saw and they fit neatly with Christian doctrines.  It established a home for God and souls and put human beings at the center of the universe, making them the critical link between God and everything else in the “great chain of being”.

spoiler alert: he is.

Ideas began to change during the scientific revolution and scientists started to build their ideas off each other.  The scientific revolution began with the Copernican hypothesis, but it was a gradual change/process.  During this process, science was becoming science was becoming independent of religion and began questioning religion instead of just agreeing with it.

Copernicus and Aristotle had different ideas.  Aristotle's ideas made sense to people and religions, saying that  earth was at the center of the universe, there was a place for God in the universe, and since people were at the center, they were the link between God and everything else in the “great chain of being”.  Copernicus, on the other hand, was condemned by religions because he said the sun was at the center of the universe and the earth was just another planet.  By characterizing earth as just another planet, the basic idea of Aristotelian physics was destroyed and he said the earthly world wasn’t really different from the heavenly world.


Tycho Brahe was a Danish astronomer whose greatest contribution was his mass of data, but his limited understanding of math prevented him from making sense of his data.  His idea of the universe was  part Ptolemaic, part Copernican.  He believed that all plants revolved around the sun and the entire group of sun and planets revolved around the earth-moon system.

Johannes Kepler furthered Brahe’s work and contributed the 3 laws that govern orbital motion: orbits of planets are elliptical, planets don’t move at uniform speed, and  the time a planet takes to complete its orbit is related to its distance from the sun.


Galileo's greatest achievement was the elaboration and consolidation of the experimental method (conducted controlled experiments to find out what actually happened instead of speculating).  His law of inertia was also important.  It stated that  rest is not the natural state of objects.  Rather, objects are constantly in motion and there are  equal forces pushing against each other (table pushing book up, gravity pushing book down à at rest).  Inertia went against Aristotle’s ideas because Galileo is saying that things are constantly in motion, whereas Aristotle said that a uniform force moved an object at a constant speed and the object would stop as soon as that force was moved.  Galileo was tried for  heresy by the papal Inquisition because he said the sun was at the center of the universe.


A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.  A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes some aspects of the universe.  A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements.  Do laws and theories change when we discover new information?  Do new discoveries make the previous versions of theories and laws false?

How did people apply the methods from the scientific revolution to life and the Enlightenment?  The Enlightenment applies scientific methods to society as a whole.


Monday, November 30, 2015

Don't stick to the status quo


Hello Euro friends,
Today we discussed Mr. Yarnall’s favorite author, Immanuel Kant.

·       First, let’s brush up on our previous Enlightenment knowledge:
o   The Enlightenment submitted everything to the methods of natural science: people began to look at everything with a rational, critical mindset.
o   This was the first time that rationalism and science really battled religious thought.
§  They were only awkwardly hugging and pretending to get along during the Renaissance, when religion still maintained the upper hand and science developed exclusively in support of religion.
o   The idea of progress also emerged: not only that human beings were capable of getting somewhere in life, but also that we could improve ourselves and our societies.
o   John Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding discussed his idea that the human mind is a blank slate, tabula rasa, at birth, on which the environment writes an individual’s understandings and beliefs.
§  Human development is determined by education and social institutions: this realization (along with many other factors) caused people to question authority and the institutions that dictated the way they thought; people began to think for themselves.

(throwback to high school musical in 3rd grade)


                 
Pre-Enlightenment
Stick to the stuff you know
If you wanna be cool
Follow one simple rule
Don't mess with the flow, no no
Stick to the status quo

Philosophes during the Enlightenment
Look at me
And what do you see
Intelligence beyond compare
But inside I am stirring
Something strange is occuring
It's a secret I need to share

Reason & Thinking were hard, people weren’t used to it
Open up, dig way down deep

And It wasn’t always accepted
Is that even legal?


The status quo was: Doing your given job in society, not questioning authority.
Society was very compartmentalized: the doctors treated people, the clergymen taught the Bible, and the boxes never expanded, doctors didn’t try to advance medicine, and religion was seemingly impossible to change. People never thought or stepped outside their boxes.


·       allegory of the cave:

·       The prisoners were told what each shadow was…
·       If the prisoners were freed from their chains, they would not know when they looked at the real cat that it was a cat, they would only think that the shadow was a cat.
o   People were fed all of their knowledge by authorities
o   The shadow idea sheds light on how ancient and limited knowledge was. The people didn’t think, what they knew was only a shadow of the knowledge they were capable of.

Here are some quotes from class that I attempted to translate:

·       “Enlightenment is man’s release from his self incurred tutelage”
o   Our tutelage is the status quo from which we are scared to deviate.

·       “tutelage is man’s inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another”
o   The status quo held man back, instead of using his head and creating his own ideas, he just copied everyone else.
the status quo at the time was quite outdated and impractical

·       “ ‘Have courage to use your own reason!’—that is the motto of the Enlightenment”
o   Be daring like Nicole! Wear a scarf! At the risk of punishment from some of our less enlightened authorities, think for yourself. If you have reasoned that a wool scarf is warmer than the cotton uniform sweater, wear it (it is rational and makes sense, right?).

o   The thing is, everyone else is wearing the uniform sweater, and its easier to wear the uniform sweater, you won’t get in trouble and it is what you know as right.


·       “I need not think, if I can only pay—others will readily undertake the irksome work for me”
o   (As in, some authority figure will joyfully make your fashion choices for you)
o   Adhering to the status quo by doing nothing for yourself and going to the clergyman for spiritual aid, the doctor for medical aid…is mindless and prevents each person from thinking for himself, it also prevents change because no one feels the need to deviate from the status quo.
·       “After the guardians have first made their domestic cattle dumb and have made sure that these placid creatures will not dare take a single step without the harness of the cart to which they are confined, the guardians then show them the danger which threatens if they try to go alone.”
o   By raising a society in which people just follow a prescribed list of what to do, it is almost against the nature of the people of society to rebel, they only know life as guided by the religious and governmental authorities.
Nothing NEW! nothing in the brain, either
o   Mankind essentially lost his tool of reason, society had bred him to live without it.
·       “He has come to be fond of this state (of tutelage), and he is for the present really incapable of making use of his reason. For no one ever let him try it out.”
o   It is easy to just live the same life as everyone else and people are lazy.
o   Reason was lost tool-like a leg and people evolved over time so that this leg was almost lost, so when some started using reason during the Enlightenment, no one was comfortable or knew how to use this leg because it had been so long.
§  They had to learn how to walk again (or think again)!
·       “For there will always be some independent thinkers, who…will disseminate the spirit of the rational appreciation of both their own worth and every man’s vocation for thinking for himself.”
o   …Nicole will always break the dress code to remind us that we are capable of doing so, just as philosophers of the time reminded the people that they do possess reason and rationality, they had just been raised not to use it.

·       “Thus the public can only slowly attain enlightenment. Perhaps a fall of personal despotism or of avaricious or tyrannical oppression may be accomplished by revolution, but never a true reform in ways of thinking.”
o   …So maybe we’ll find a lay leader who will not stop us in the hall for our sock height, but most of us will still abide by the uniform, because everyone else is.

o   Even today with all these hippy liberal arts colleges that try to train people to think instead of only how to do their job, in the end, society will still only value the job we hold. Also, man’s tendency to conform will never change.
·       “Nothing is required but freedom…it is the freedom to make use of one’s reason at every point…But I hear on all sides ‘Do not argue’…everywhere freedom is restricted.”
o   The status quo restricted freedom, and the compartmentalization of society, that each man had a specific job to fulfill and that was it…prevented people from thinking outside the box.
§  People didn’t know how to deal with such change, it had been so restricted

·       Aside from writing the lovely peace we read today, Kant argued that if serious thinkers were granted the freedom to exercise their reason publicly in print, the Enlightenment would follow.
o   Freedom of the press was important because it spread ideas, reason and the idea of humans using their heads so maybe more people would start to use theirs.
o   The enlightenment established the belief that everything is to be studied, analyzed, and questioned. Ideas should be shared and exchanged, not cemented for eternity in a dusty Bible.

·       Immanuel Kant is often associated with the reading revolution, which witnessed the transformation of reading from a communal, patriarchal, and spiritual learning experience to a more individual, silent, rapid, scientific, critical experience.



·       For Tomorrow: think of “renaissance backwards /enlightenment forwards”
o   The Renaissance glorified religion and established power, while science involved the re-awakening of ancient Greek and Roman beliefs.
o   The Enlightenment questioned religion, established social science, people went all Locke on the world and questioned government, some people were transformed from numbskulled yes-men to thought provoking radicals, science and technology established many new beliefs and created new tools.
o   But could the Enlightenment have occurred without the Renaissance?