Oh so many revolutions and
changes…. (2.23.16)
IRELAND
Why was the great
famine so devastating?
The
condition of the Irish peasantry was truly abominable, living in wretched
cottages with limited clothing, in a complete state of poverty. The Irish population skyrocketed due to the
extensive cultivation of the potato, early marriage and exploitation of
peasants by landlords. The potato could feed a whole family on a very limited
plot of land. The Irish men and women married early, lived in makeshift houses
where the family barely scraped by, eating only potatoes. As population and
potato dependency increased so did the fragility of the state of the Irish
well-being. For this reason and the almost complete dependency upon potatoes,
the blight that spread over the potato
crop for years was truly disastrous. The Great Famine caused widespread
starvation and mass fever epidemics.
The
British government, continued to store its faith in laissez-faire
ideology and the
repeal of the Corn-Laws, but were not helpful in that
it was too little too late. The Great Famine shattered the growth pattern of
the Irish population and intensified anti-British feeling, thereby promoting
Irish nationalism.
FRANCE
The Revolution of
1830 in France:
Louis XVII’s
Constitutional Charter of 1814- a ‘gift’ from the king but actually a response to
political pressures was a liberal constitution that acknowledged many of the
changes of the French revolution and guaranteed civil liberties. The economic
and social gains made by the middle class and peasantry in the French
Revolution were completely protected, greatly intellectual and artistically free.
In addition to this, a parliament with upper and lower houses was created.
Instead of catering to the revolutionary changes, Louis appointed moderate
royalists as his ministers who sought and obtained the support of a majority of
the representatives previously elected to the lower Chamber of
Deputies. The
Charter could not be considered democratic as only a fraction of the population
(wealthiest males) had the right to vote.
Charles X- Louis’ successor, Charles X,
is commonly considered a true
reactionary, with
a pre-1789 mentality, unwilling to lose the throne yet willing to ‘reinstate’
the legitimate rule. Wanting to re-establish the old order in France, Charles
turned to military effort in the economic and diplomatic dispute with Muslim Algeria to rally French nationalism.
In three weeks, victory and the rebirth of French colonial expansion were
complete. Emboldened by victory in Algeria, Charles repudiated the
Constitutional Charter in an attempted coup in July 1830. In addition to this,
Charles issued decrees that stripped the majority of the wealthy middle class
of its voting rights, and censored the press. In “three glorious days”, the government collapsed,
Paris boiled with revolutionary excitement and Charles then fled. The upper
middle class, seated Charles’ cousin, Louis Philippe on the throne.
Louis Philippe- Louis Philippe accepted the
Constitutional Charter of 1814 and adopted the red, white and blue flag of the French Revolution.
Admitting that he was just the “king of the French people”, a nation that many, including
Perier considered had never really undergone a revolution.
The Revolutions of 1848
A Democratic
Republic in France
“Prerevolutionary”
outbreaks occurred all over Europe and it took revolution in Paris to turn the
expectation of a revolution into a reality. Louis Philippe’s “bourgeois
monarchy” was
characterized by inaction, complacency, a lack of social legislation, and
politics dictated by corruption and selfish interests. The government’s refusal
to consider electoral reform led to barricades and the abdication of the throne
with favor of his grandson. But the common people would not tolerate a
monarchy, therefore there was a proclamation of a provisional republic, headed
by a ten-man executive committee and certified by cries of approval from the
revolutionary crowd.
The government's refusal to consider electoral reform. |
A lack of unity in desires and social groups
of the revolutionary coalition in Paris led to the eventual failure of the
republic.
Louis
Blanc represented
the republican socialists of the provisional government and is well known for
his assertion that permanent government-sponsored cooperative workshops should
be established for workers (alternative to capitalist employment & decisive
step toward a new, noncompetitive social order). To the new Constituent Assembly, a variety of men and women
were represented but a clash of ideologies of liberal capitalism and socialism
cause a clash of classes. On June 22, the government dissolved Blanc’s national
workshops in Paris, giving the workers only two choices: join the army or go to
workshops in the provinces. Because of this dissolution, there was a
spontaneous and violent uprising that included the erection of barricades.
After three “June
Days” the
republican army triumphed. In place of a generous democratic republic, the
Constituent Assembly completed a constitution featuring strong executive
leadership.
The Austrian
Empire in 1848
The
revolution in the Austrian Empire began in Hungary, where nationalistic
Hungarians
(Magyars) demanded national autonomy, full civil liberties, and universal
suffrage. When the monarchy in Vienna hesitated, Viennese students and workers
took to the street and peasant disorder broke out in parts of the empire. The
Hapsburg emperor Ferdinand
I promised a
liberal constitution. The old absolutist order seemed to be collapsing.
Soon,
the monarchy abolished serfdom and the freed men and women lost their interest
in the political and social problems of the urban areas.
The
Hungarian revolutionaries were nationalists who wanted a unified and
centralized Hungarian nation. At the same time, the Habsburg monarchy took
advantage of the fears of the minority groups. Throughout Austria and Germany,
the middle
class wanted
liberal reform with constitutional monarchy that employed limited voting rights
and social measures. The middle classes were repulsed by the urban poor’s rise
in arms and their demands including Blanc’s socialist workshops and male
suffrage.
What so many middle class citizens wanted in liberal reform... |
Conservatives followed Emperor Ferdinand I,
who was encouraged by the archduchess Sophia to abdicate for her son Francis Joseph. Windischgratz
bombarded Prague and put down a working class revolt as Austrian troops
re-acquired their land. Following this, the Austrian army attacked the radicals
of Vienna and recaptured that city as well. Francis Joseph was soon crowned
emperor of Austria.
Prussia and the
Frankfurt Assembly
The
goals of the Prussian middle class began with an adoption of a liberal
constitution (combining German states into a cohesive nation). Frederick William
IV promised to
grant the Prussian liberals their constitution and create the German nation.
Urban workers wanted an even more radical revolution and the wealthy wanted no
revolution.
The Frankfurt National
Assembly, a group
of liberals from a variety of states, met to create a federal constitution for
their promised German nation. The assembly contemplated the issue of the
provinces of Schleswig
and Holstein, but
when Fredrick
VII tried to
integrate them, the Germans revolted. Once the National Assembly completed its
constitution and elected Fredrick
William the leader
of the united German national state, he rejected the assembly itself and took
complete control of the state.
Thank you! I hope this helps!
Much love,
Franny <3
No comments:
Post a Comment