Absolutism in the French Monarchy: Louis XIV, Sully, & Richelieu
Paris is worth a mass.
Henry IV converted to Catholicism but we already knew that.1.) WHO WAS A LARGER THREAT TO POPE'S POWER --> HUGUENOTS OR KING LOUIS XIV? (2 main threats to absolutism - nobility and church)
- Well, they each possessed different types of power
- King --> power of the state
- Huguenots --> power of the nobles/masses/could cause reformation
- King and Pope had a balance of power because:
- if Pope agreed to the Divine Right/Absolute Power of the King then he would not question the King's authority--> NOT THAT BIG OF A THREAT
- not one was overpowering the other - rather they were kind of working together
- While Huguenots could try to over throw the Cath Religion through reformations/violence
- SO IN CONCLUSION: Erin as my witness --> Huguenots are a larger threat
(Low-key us trynna agree on who was a bigger threat)
2.) What was the foundation of French absolutism built upon?
- Built upon sand.
- Things are unstable economically
- it is the finances that make French absolutism built upon shifting sands!
- Through lowering taxes = peasants are happy
- keeping Nobles in check by keeping them preoccupied with essentially trivial jobs
- keeping ministers happy by giving them power in the state
- By King gaining love of his people --> he had the ability to develop the characteristics of an absolute ruler
3.) Economics/Finances with Sully & Richelieu
- Henry IV lowered taxes on the overburdened peasants --> in compensation for lost revenue - he introduced paulette - an annual fee paid by royal offices to guarantee heredity in their offices
- Sully --> combined indirect taxes on salt, sales, and transit and leased their collection to FINANCERS
- revenue increased because of this revival in trade
- he subsidized the Company for Trade w/ the Indies
- started country-wide highway system
- SULLY = ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
- WHILE RICHI OVER HERE IS TRYNNA SUBORDINATE EVERYONE LIKE EW STOP
(@ Richelieu on solving economic issues)
- Richelieu set in place the cornerstone of French absolutism
- Richelieu's policy was the total subordination of all groups and institutions TO THE FRENCH MONARCHY
- how did Richelieu and Sully's intentions differ??
- Richelieu = subordination under french monarchy for political POWER
- Sully = intentions centralize around France's economic prosperity as a country
- French foreign policy under Richelieu was aimed at the destruction of the fence of Habsburg territories that surrounded France
- he signed a treaty in 1631 w/ Gustavus Adolphus promising French support against the CATHOLIC HABSBURGS in 30Years' War. :)
- BUT DID RICHELIEU MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FIX ECONOMIC ISSUES OF THE TIME???
I mean he did do some stuff like:
- temporarily solved financial problems by securing the cooperation of local elites
- the central government shared the proceeds of tax revenue with the local powers - however this backfired because it limited French Absolutism LOL
No comments:
Post a Comment