Monday, November 30, 2015

Don't stick to the status quo


Hello Euro friends,
Today we discussed Mr. Yarnall’s favorite author, Immanuel Kant.

·       First, let’s brush up on our previous Enlightenment knowledge:
o   The Enlightenment submitted everything to the methods of natural science: people began to look at everything with a rational, critical mindset.
o   This was the first time that rationalism and science really battled religious thought.
§  They were only awkwardly hugging and pretending to get along during the Renaissance, when religion still maintained the upper hand and science developed exclusively in support of religion.
o   The idea of progress also emerged: not only that human beings were capable of getting somewhere in life, but also that we could improve ourselves and our societies.
o   John Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding discussed his idea that the human mind is a blank slate, tabula rasa, at birth, on which the environment writes an individual’s understandings and beliefs.
§  Human development is determined by education and social institutions: this realization (along with many other factors) caused people to question authority and the institutions that dictated the way they thought; people began to think for themselves.

(throwback to high school musical in 3rd grade)


                 
Pre-Enlightenment
Stick to the stuff you know
If you wanna be cool
Follow one simple rule
Don't mess with the flow, no no
Stick to the status quo

Philosophes during the Enlightenment
Look at me
And what do you see
Intelligence beyond compare
But inside I am stirring
Something strange is occuring
It's a secret I need to share

Reason & Thinking were hard, people weren’t used to it
Open up, dig way down deep

And It wasn’t always accepted
Is that even legal?


The status quo was: Doing your given job in society, not questioning authority.
Society was very compartmentalized: the doctors treated people, the clergymen taught the Bible, and the boxes never expanded, doctors didn’t try to advance medicine, and religion was seemingly impossible to change. People never thought or stepped outside their boxes.


·       allegory of the cave:

·       The prisoners were told what each shadow was…
·       If the prisoners were freed from their chains, they would not know when they looked at the real cat that it was a cat, they would only think that the shadow was a cat.
o   People were fed all of their knowledge by authorities
o   The shadow idea sheds light on how ancient and limited knowledge was. The people didn’t think, what they knew was only a shadow of the knowledge they were capable of.

Here are some quotes from class that I attempted to translate:

·       “Enlightenment is man’s release from his self incurred tutelage”
o   Our tutelage is the status quo from which we are scared to deviate.

·       “tutelage is man’s inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another”
o   The status quo held man back, instead of using his head and creating his own ideas, he just copied everyone else.
the status quo at the time was quite outdated and impractical

·       “ ‘Have courage to use your own reason!’—that is the motto of the Enlightenment”
o   Be daring like Nicole! Wear a scarf! At the risk of punishment from some of our less enlightened authorities, think for yourself. If you have reasoned that a wool scarf is warmer than the cotton uniform sweater, wear it (it is rational and makes sense, right?).

o   The thing is, everyone else is wearing the uniform sweater, and its easier to wear the uniform sweater, you won’t get in trouble and it is what you know as right.


·       “I need not think, if I can only pay—others will readily undertake the irksome work for me”
o   (As in, some authority figure will joyfully make your fashion choices for you)
o   Adhering to the status quo by doing nothing for yourself and going to the clergyman for spiritual aid, the doctor for medical aid…is mindless and prevents each person from thinking for himself, it also prevents change because no one feels the need to deviate from the status quo.
·       “After the guardians have first made their domestic cattle dumb and have made sure that these placid creatures will not dare take a single step without the harness of the cart to which they are confined, the guardians then show them the danger which threatens if they try to go alone.”
o   By raising a society in which people just follow a prescribed list of what to do, it is almost against the nature of the people of society to rebel, they only know life as guided by the religious and governmental authorities.
Nothing NEW! nothing in the brain, either
o   Mankind essentially lost his tool of reason, society had bred him to live without it.
·       “He has come to be fond of this state (of tutelage), and he is for the present really incapable of making use of his reason. For no one ever let him try it out.”
o   It is easy to just live the same life as everyone else and people are lazy.
o   Reason was lost tool-like a leg and people evolved over time so that this leg was almost lost, so when some started using reason during the Enlightenment, no one was comfortable or knew how to use this leg because it had been so long.
§  They had to learn how to walk again (or think again)!
·       “For there will always be some independent thinkers, who…will disseminate the spirit of the rational appreciation of both their own worth and every man’s vocation for thinking for himself.”
o   …Nicole will always break the dress code to remind us that we are capable of doing so, just as philosophers of the time reminded the people that they do possess reason and rationality, they had just been raised not to use it.

·       “Thus the public can only slowly attain enlightenment. Perhaps a fall of personal despotism or of avaricious or tyrannical oppression may be accomplished by revolution, but never a true reform in ways of thinking.”
o   …So maybe we’ll find a lay leader who will not stop us in the hall for our sock height, but most of us will still abide by the uniform, because everyone else is.

o   Even today with all these hippy liberal arts colleges that try to train people to think instead of only how to do their job, in the end, society will still only value the job we hold. Also, man’s tendency to conform will never change.
·       “Nothing is required but freedom…it is the freedom to make use of one’s reason at every point…But I hear on all sides ‘Do not argue’…everywhere freedom is restricted.”
o   The status quo restricted freedom, and the compartmentalization of society, that each man had a specific job to fulfill and that was it…prevented people from thinking outside the box.
§  People didn’t know how to deal with such change, it had been so restricted

·       Aside from writing the lovely peace we read today, Kant argued that if serious thinkers were granted the freedom to exercise their reason publicly in print, the Enlightenment would follow.
o   Freedom of the press was important because it spread ideas, reason and the idea of humans using their heads so maybe more people would start to use theirs.
o   The enlightenment established the belief that everything is to be studied, analyzed, and questioned. Ideas should be shared and exchanged, not cemented for eternity in a dusty Bible.

·       Immanuel Kant is often associated with the reading revolution, which witnessed the transformation of reading from a communal, patriarchal, and spiritual learning experience to a more individual, silent, rapid, scientific, critical experience.



·       For Tomorrow: think of “renaissance backwards /enlightenment forwards”
o   The Renaissance glorified religion and established power, while science involved the re-awakening of ancient Greek and Roman beliefs.
o   The Enlightenment questioned religion, established social science, people went all Locke on the world and questioned government, some people were transformed from numbskulled yes-men to thought provoking radicals, science and technology established many new beliefs and created new tools.
o   But could the Enlightenment have occurred without the Renaissance?

Thursday, November 19, 2015

November 18, 2015 Blog: Great Northern War, Baroque, Peter the Great vs Louis XIV, Test Review Terms 

Great Northern War:
After Peter the Great made a secret alliance with Denmark and the elector of Saxony (elected king of Poland), he waged a war against Sweden. At the time, Sweden was a leading European power as the rulers had developed a strong absolutist government and built a fabulous standing army. Sweden who also had a significant amount of territory spread throughout Europe. Peter and his allies thought that with their combined forces, they could easily obtain victory over the new, inexperienced Swedish king, Charles XII. Charles XII showed military genius when he easily defeated Denmark and had its sights set on Russia. Ending up victorious, the land that bordered the Baltic (given to Sweden after the 30 years war) is of very high value and therefore aggravates he that it is lost.
Baroque:
The baroque was a reflection of absolutist rulers and their desire to be like Louis XIV. Louis XIV, a man who set many precedents set ones for theme of the future. This passage made it clear that only one party is interested or invested in the conversation. In addition to being merely physically similar, they must have been able to switch without notice. He tried to replicate not only the culture but used Versailles to illustrate his power and the baroque and his supposed building had the same purpose. St. Petersburg was the grand creation of Peter the Great (hence the name) and a replication of Vienna. 
(Current art exhibit in St. Petersburg- a place of innovation and culture)

Peter the Great vs. Louis the 14th:
(From Class there are a few arguments, so here are a few):
1.     Peter the Great and Louis XIV were different because there were different circumstances.
2.     Peter the Great was only successful because he emulated the ruling style of Louis XIV.
3.     Peter the Great’s rule would not have been affected had it been before or after the rule of Louis XIV.

Review For the Test:
·       Byzantine Empire- Catholic, Eastern Roman Empire: After Roman Empire fell apart, the eastern half attempted to remain cohesive for another 1000 years. The Byzantine Empire spans the width of land from Greece to Asia, with its capital in modern day Istanbul (Constantinople used to be the ruler). The people’s religion was no longer Roman Catholic as it switched to an Orthodox religion.
o   Byzantine Influence on Russia: Moscow is the third Rome. Muscovites were inheritors of Roman Empire.
·       Prussia:
o   Elector is a title and the family retains the title (same thing)
o   William the Great Elector
o   Flow chart (D2L) – Makes reference to the leaders and compared all three and the impediments they are experiencing in their governing attempt.
o   Junkers
·       Austria:
o   Subject nationalities- main issue
o   Many long range problems for Austria.
o   Pragmatic sanction- house and possessions never to be divided

·       Random
o   Hereditary subjugation
o   First among equals
o   What you need to be an absolutist state (3 points)
·       Russia:
o   Boyards
o   Early parts of Russia and the 4 rulers
Ivan the Great- Ivan the Terrible- Michael Romanov- Peter the Great

Thank y'all!! See you in a few! 
-Franny <3